<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Aesthetically</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aimeeknight.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aimeeknight.com</link>
	<description>Beauty is truth, truth beauty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 11:48:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The New Aesthetic…perhaps by Steven W. Hopkins (@seemylittleknee)</title>
		<link>http://aimeeknight.com/2012/04/10/the-new-aestheticperhaps/#comment-1910</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven W. Hopkins (@seemylittleknee)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 11:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aimeeknight.com/?p=5071#comment-1910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re the first person I&#039;ve seen that acknowledges openly that New Aesthetic is thought experiment, or pretend, as you call it. During Computers and Writing I heard a few people talking about object oriented ontology and talking about the sensory experience of objects as if they actually had sensory experiences. But it seems like either too much of a stretch or just gobbledegook to not admit that we are at least projecting our own experience on these objects. 

I agree with you that the power of new aesthetic comes from how it opens up a new way of seeing. In my mind, there is a power that comes from admitting to the distributed quality of our sensory perceptions as they are mediated by our digital environments. It humbles us (or should humble us) to recognize that we aren&#039;t the only source of knowledge or perception or information, but that everything in our environment is part of all of them. I just think the digital makes that more obvious. 

There&#039;s something really great in the new aesthetic, and I don&#039;t like that we have to get caught up in the semantics of this label that Bridle put on it. It&#039;s not new, and it&#039;s connection to aesthetic, as you pointed out, doesn&#039;t always make sense. But bridle put a name on something a very real part of how many people experience the world, and I like having a label to place on evidence of that experience.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re the first person I&#8217;ve seen that acknowledges openly that New Aesthetic is thought experiment, or pretend, as you call it. During Computers and Writing I heard a few people talking about object oriented ontology and talking about the sensory experience of objects as if they actually had sensory experiences. But it seems like either too much of a stretch or just gobbledegook to not admit that we are at least projecting our own experience on these objects. </p>
<p>I agree with you that the power of new aesthetic comes from how it opens up a new way of seeing. In my mind, there is a power that comes from admitting to the distributed quality of our sensory perceptions as they are mediated by our digital environments. It humbles us (or should humble us) to recognize that we aren&#8217;t the only source of knowledge or perception or information, but that everything in our environment is part of all of them. I just think the digital makes that more obvious. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s something really great in the new aesthetic, and I don&#8217;t like that we have to get caught up in the semantics of this label that Bridle put on it. It&#8217;s not new, and it&#8217;s connection to aesthetic, as you pointed out, doesn&#8217;t always make sense. But bridle put a name on something a very real part of how many people experience the world, and I like having a label to place on evidence of that experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kress &amp; Van Leeuwen: Multimodal Discourse (2001) by malan lubis</title>
		<link>http://aimeeknight.com/2010/06/16/kress-van-leeuwen-multimodal-discourse-2001/#comment-1907</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[malan lubis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 06:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aimeeknight.com/?p=1182#comment-1907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[beg your assistance for my dissertation titled &quot;Indonesia Daily Newspaper Caricature&quot; (multimodal studies) how the frame, Please contact me at email lbsmalan@gmail.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>beg your assistance for my dissertation titled &#8220;Indonesia Daily Newspaper Caricature&#8221; (multimodal studies) how the frame, Please contact me at email <a href="mailto:lbsmalan@gmail.com">lbsmalan@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Peering into the kaleidoscope at the power of x by drL</title>
		<link>http://aimeeknight.com/2012/04/24/peering-into-the-kaleidoscope-at-the-power-of-x/#comment-1896</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aimeeknight.com/?p=5176#comment-1896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[beautiful. 

You know, many art forms can sort of mathematically justify why and/or how things work (like music), which makes me wonder if, to some being somewhere, the whole world and every beautiful being in it are also some kind of lovely equation, spun into form....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>beautiful. </p>
<p>You know, many art forms can sort of mathematically justify why and/or how things work (like music), which makes me wonder if, to some being somewhere, the whole world and every beautiful being in it are also some kind of lovely equation, spun into form&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Peering into the kaleidoscope at the power of x by Aimée Knight</title>
		<link>http://aimeeknight.com/2012/04/24/peering-into-the-kaleidoscope-at-the-power-of-x/#comment-1889</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aimée Knight]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aimeeknight.com/?p=5176#comment-1889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Madame. It&#039;s fascinating how beauty has a sort of formula...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Madame. It&#8217;s fascinating how beauty has a sort of formula&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Peering into the kaleidoscope at the power of x by Madame Fromage</title>
		<link>http://aimeeknight.com/2012/04/24/peering-into-the-kaleidoscope-at-the-power-of-x/#comment-1888</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madame Fromage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aimeeknight.com/?p=5176#comment-1888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mmm, I like this reflection -- particularly the attention to Islamic patterning, which was so evident in everything from the exquisite caligraphy we sat at the Museum of Islamic Art to the lobby floor of the W Hotel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmm, I like this reflection &#8212; particularly the attention to Islamic patterning, which was so evident in everything from the exquisite caligraphy we sat at the Museum of Islamic Art to the lobby floor of the W Hotel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wysocki, awaywithwords: On the Possibilities in Unavailable Designs (2005) by Available genres? &#171; the parable maternal: a blog on writing, rhetoric, and literary studies.</title>
		<link>http://aimeeknight.com/2010/06/16/wysocki-awaywithwords-on-the-possibilities-in-unavailable-designs-2005/#comment-1880</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Available genres? &#171; the parable maternal: a blog on writing, rhetoric, and literary studies.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aimeeknight.com/?p=1199#comment-1880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to point this in the direction of genre selection and the effect it has on delivery. Here&#8217;s a review of Anne Wysocki&#8217;s essay titled &#8220;awaywithwords.&#8221; Here&#8217;s another review, from [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to point this in the direction of genre selection and the effect it has on delivery. Here&#8217;s a review of Anne Wysocki&#8217;s essay titled &#8220;awaywithwords.&#8221; Here&#8217;s another review, from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The New Aesthetic…perhaps by gregorylent</title>
		<link>http://aimeeknight.com/2012/04/10/the-new-aestheticperhaps/#comment-1878</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gregorylent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 05:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aimeeknight.com/?p=5071#comment-1878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it&#039;s the beginning of wide-spread astral vision ... a global refinement of consciousness is underway ... watch it play out over the coming decades

as you well know :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s the beginning of wide-spread astral vision &#8230; a global refinement of consciousness is underway &#8230; watch it play out over the coming decades</p>
<p>as you well know <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lost: the aesthetic by The New Aesthetic…perhaps &#124; Aesthetically</title>
		<link>http://aimeeknight.com/2010/11/03/lost-the-aesthetic/#comment-1875</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The New Aesthetic…perhaps &#124; Aesthetically]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aimeeknight.com/?p=2206#comment-1875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] It’s useful to look back.  Take Immanual Kant, for example. Following the lead of the Greeks, he defined and located the aesthetic in the abstract and universal (while shunning the particular, empirical, or applied). He set a precedent for the aesthetic to be explained in other terms, with other criteria—for example, with historical, cultural, ideological, or political associations. Notably, aesthetic/sensory perception and the meaning derived from that were no longer an acceptable way of knowing the world; the lower senses could only offer deceptive, illusory appearances and mere impressions of how things really are. (More here). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It’s useful to look back.  Take Immanual Kant, for example. Following the lead of the Greeks, he defined and located the aesthetic in the abstract and universal (while shunning the particular, empirical, or applied). He set a precedent for the aesthetic to be explained in other terms, with other criteria—for example, with historical, cultural, ideological, or political associations. Notably, aesthetic/sensory perception and the meaning derived from that were no longer an acceptable way of knowing the world; the lower senses could only offer deceptive, illusory appearances and mere impressions of how things really are. (More here). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lost: the aesthetic by The New Aesthetic…perhaps &#124; Aesthetically</title>
		<link>http://aimeeknight.com/2010/11/03/lost-the-aesthetic/#comment-1876</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The New Aesthetic…perhaps &#124; Aesthetically]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aimeeknight.com/?p=2206#comment-1876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] It’s useful to look back.  Take Immanual Kant, for example. Following the lead of the Greeks, he defined and located the aesthetic in the abstract and universal (while shunning the particular, empirical, or applied). He set a precedent for the aesthetic to be explained in other terms, with other criteria—for example, with historical, cultural, ideological, or political associations. Notably, aesthetic/sensory perception and the meaning derived from that were no longer an acceptable way of knowing the world; the lower senses could only offer deceptive, illusory appearances and mere impressions of how things really are. (More here). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It’s useful to look back.  Take Immanual Kant, for example. Following the lead of the Greeks, he defined and located the aesthetic in the abstract and universal (while shunning the particular, empirical, or applied). He set a precedent for the aesthetic to be explained in other terms, with other criteria—for example, with historical, cultural, ideological, or political associations. Notably, aesthetic/sensory perception and the meaning derived from that were no longer an acceptable way of knowing the world; the lower senses could only offer deceptive, illusory appearances and mere impressions of how things really are. (More here). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reviews by The New Aesthetic…perhaps &#124; Aesthetically</title>
		<link>http://aimeeknight.com/reviews/#comment-1874</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The New Aesthetic…perhaps &#124; Aesthetically]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aimeeknight.com/?page_id=4454#comment-1874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Reviews [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reviews [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

